New Delhi: The Uttar Pradesh government’s new Digital Media Policy has sparked controversy due to a clause perceived as a potential threat to freedom of speech. The policy aims to financially reward content creators who promote government initiatives, but critics argue a section allowing legal action against content deemed ‘anti-national’ or ‘anti-social’ is overly broad and could stifle journalism.
Key Concerns
- Vague Terminology: The policy’s use of terms like “anti-national” and “anti-social” is ambiguous and open to interpretation, raising concerns that it could be misused to target critical content.
- Chilling Effect on Free Speech: Critics argue that the broad nature of the clause could have a chilling effect on free speech, as journalists may self-censor their work for fear of legal repercussions.
- Conflict of Interest: The policy appears to favor content that promotes the government’s agenda, while potentially penalizing legitimate criticism. This creates a conflict of interest, as the government becomes the arbiter of what constitutes acceptable speech.
ALSO READ: Reliance Retail Sets Sights on Luxury Jewellery, Aims to Double Retail Business
Similarities to Overturned Law
The Press Club of India and other press bodies have pointed out similarities between this clause and Section 66A of the Information Technology Act, which was struck down by the Supreme Court in 2015. Section 66A was also criticized for its vague language and potential to stifle free speech.
Importance of a Free Press
A free and independent media is essential for a functioning democracy. It plays a vital role in informing citizens, holding the government accountable, and scrutinizing its policies. The Press Club of India has called on the Uttar Pradesh government to withdraw the controversial clause from its Digital Media Policy.
